不等價客體錯誤的評價理論? - 考試
By Genevieve
at 2014-04-22T08:19
at 2014-04-22T08:19
Table of Contents
例:甲欲殺乙,誤充氣娃娃為乙而對娃娃開槍
撲馬師的書上是寫客體錯誤通說認為採法定符合說;
金律師的書上則是說等價客體錯誤採法定符合說,
不等價客體錯誤通說採具體符合說。
雖然兩說適用結果都一樣會阻卻故意
但是考試時該採哪一說去作答呢?
麻煩解惑,感謝orz
--
撲馬師的書上是寫客體錯誤通說認為採法定符合說;
金律師的書上則是說等價客體錯誤採法定符合說,
不等價客體錯誤通說採具體符合說。
雖然兩說適用結果都一樣會阻卻故意
但是考試時該採哪一說去作答呢?
麻煩解惑,感謝orz
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Poppy
at 2014-04-25T00:07
at 2014-04-25T00:07
By Oscar
at 2014-04-25T12:03
at 2014-04-25T12:03
By Jake
at 2014-04-27T02:20
at 2014-04-27T02:20
By Christine
at 2014-04-28T12:24
at 2014-04-28T12:24
By Edwina
at 2014-05-02T18:29
at 2014-05-02T18:29
By Kumar
at 2014-05-03T00:08
at 2014-05-03T00:08
By Elizabeth
at 2014-05-07T07:11
at 2014-05-07T07:11
By Elizabeth
at 2014-05-12T05:31
at 2014-05-12T05:31
By Caitlin
at 2014-05-14T01:09
at 2014-05-14T01:09
By Erin
at 2014-05-17T03:05
at 2014-05-17T03:05
By Michael
at 2014-05-17T23:13
at 2014-05-17T23:13
Related Posts
美國會計師考試教材
By Ursula
at 2014-04-22T00:25
at 2014-04-22T00:25
關務四等英文 第35題
By Kumar
at 2014-04-22T00:21
at 2014-04-22T00:21
詢問台電綜合行政人員相關問題
By Poppy
at 2014-04-22T00:12
at 2014-04-22T00:12
關務四等計概考題
By Hardy
at 2014-04-21T23:48
at 2014-04-21T23:48
關務四等計概
By Bethany
at 2014-04-21T23:20
at 2014-04-21T23:20