復審後提起再審議的問題(急迫 希望大家幫忙) - 考試

By Rachel
at 2013-05-27T23:15
at 2013-05-27T23:15
Table of Contents
大家好 雖然這個問題之前已經討論過了
但礙於晚輩語文能力欠佳還是有點疑惑
希望高手、有緣人能不吝指導QQ
#1EGU2TaE這篇文章中有詳細的表解
但目前還是有困惑...."兩個月後沒提行政訴訟"才能提起再審議這點
跟保障法94條的規定有點理解不能
保障法94條前段:「復審事件經保訓會審議決定,除復審人已依法向司法機關請求救濟者
外,於復審決定確定後,有下列情形之一者,原處分機關或復審人得向保訓會
申請再審議:」
1.如果依照上面理解的話 復審事件經保訓會審議決定還不算「復審決定確定」
而是指復審案議決後"經兩個月,不提起行政訴訟後"才能稱作「復審決定確定」嗎?
2.保障法94條第二句的意思是已經提行政訴訟的話就不能提再審議的意思嗎?
所以綜上所述 一般救濟情形應該是
(一)復審不服→提行政訴訟 END
(二)復審不服→不提行政訴訟(認命了)→經過兩個月行政訴訟提起期間後忽然發現
有翻案的可能(94條所列11款)但已經不能提行政訴訟→發現後30日內提再審議
*參考2013年林清-行政法的板書
*也就是提起復審後不服是不能直接提再審議的,那這樣應該不算雙軌制的救濟吧?
(郭阿公是講復審後可以同時選擇兩種
但林清跟陳治宇是講復審決定後兩個月沒提行政訴訟才能提再審議)
打完之後感覺有點拗口 我已經盡力表達了 很抱歉 Orz...
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments

By Annie
at 2013-05-29T16:52
at 2013-05-29T16:52

By Edwina
at 2013-06-01T10:18
at 2013-06-01T10:18

By Yuri
at 2013-06-02T18:01
at 2013-06-02T18:01

By Thomas
at 2013-06-04T03:45
at 2013-06-04T03:45

By Mia
at 2013-06-05T00:56
at 2013-06-05T00:56

By Frederica
at 2013-06-08T23:11
at 2013-06-08T23:11

By Sandy
at 2013-06-12T17:32
at 2013-06-12T17:32

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2013-06-15T10:42
at 2013-06-15T10:42

By Mia
at 2013-06-15T17:00
at 2013-06-15T17:00

By Mia
at 2013-06-19T21:59
at 2013-06-19T21:59

By Kristin
at 2013-06-20T10:38
at 2013-06-20T10:38

By Margaret
at 2013-06-23T01:00
at 2013-06-23T01:00

By Hazel
at 2013-06-27T12:40
at 2013-06-27T12:40

By Hedwig
at 2013-06-30T08:10
at 2013-06-30T08:10

By Susan
at 2013-07-02T09:32
at 2013-07-02T09:32

By Todd Johnson
at 2013-07-03T14:29
at 2013-07-03T14:29

By Odelette
at 2013-07-07T19:30
at 2013-07-07T19:30

By Hamiltion
at 2013-07-12T12:29
at 2013-07-12T12:29

By Dora
at 2013-07-13T16:03
at 2013-07-13T16:03

By Andrew
at 2013-07-16T16:32
at 2013-07-16T16:32

By Damian
at 2013-07-18T05:07
at 2013-07-18T05:07

By Daniel
at 2013-07-18T23:13
at 2013-07-18T23:13
Related Posts
心理學(古典制約、認知觀點、認知論)

By David
at 2013-05-27T23:11
at 2013-05-27T23:11
物理

By Damian
at 2013-05-27T22:59
at 2013-05-27T22:59
林清行政法內容問題

By Lydia
at 2013-05-27T22:49
at 2013-05-27T22:49
三等民法選擇題

By Daph Bay
at 2013-05-27T22:45
at 2013-05-27T22:45
行政法

By Thomas
at 2013-05-27T22:39
at 2013-05-27T22:39