民法 瑕疵VS保證品質的判斷(第360條) - 考試
By Olga
at 2019-01-10T19:58
at 2019-01-10T19:58
Table of Contents
民法第360條
買賣之物,缺少出賣人所保證之品質者,買受人得不解除契約或請求減少
價金,而請求不履行之損害賠償;出賣人故意不告知物之瑕疵者亦同。
想知道要如何判斷是物之瑕疵或是保證品質呢
想法:
因為物之瑕疵>在故意不告知時,出賣人方要賠償
而
缺少出賣人保證品質,出賣人必定要負賠償責任
但是不知道區分的標準在哪
問題:
那有沒有例子跟準則,可以簡單判斷今天一個商品造成消費者損害
究竟是瑕疵(之後再論有無故意) 還是 缺少保證品質呢?
謝謝大家
--
https://goo.gl/d3UyqZ
16℃現形記
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Anthony
at 2019-01-15T02:23
at 2019-01-15T02:23
By Hardy
at 2019-01-19T06:52
at 2019-01-19T06:52
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2019-01-23T15:27
at 2019-01-23T15:27
By Brianna
at 2019-01-23T20:02
at 2019-01-23T20:02
By Lucy
at 2019-01-28T15:55
at 2019-01-28T15:55
By Elizabeth
at 2019-01-31T15:19
at 2019-01-31T15:19
By Adele
at 2019-02-02T18:43
at 2019-02-02T18:43
By Lucy
at 2019-02-04T20:13
at 2019-02-04T20:13
By Lily
at 2019-02-06T11:00
at 2019-02-06T11:00
Related Posts
107司法官、律師(勞社)、法制上榜心得
By Madame
at 2019-01-10T19:53
at 2019-01-10T19:53
地方特考分析,錄取比例較高的條件有哪些
By Ula
at 2019-01-10T19:45
at 2019-01-10T19:45
陳萱公民vs林茵公民?
By Ingrid
at 2019-01-10T18:21
at 2019-01-10T18:21
刑法選擇題
By Xanthe
at 2019-01-10T17:35
at 2019-01-10T17:35
莊老師生物化學
By Daph Bay
at 2019-01-10T17:01
at 2019-01-10T17:01