民法1030-1第3項的問題 - 考試
By William
at 2013-02-01T20:25
at 2013-02-01T20:25
Table of Contents
想請問各位,在1030-1第3項增訂後夫妻財產請求權好像變得有點奇怪
譬如甲和乙為夫妻,甲死後財產100萬,而生存的乙有300萬,依舊法的話甲對乙有
100萬的夫妻財產請求權,所以甲的財產是200萬
但在本項增訂後,夫妻財產請求權不得讓與和繼承,所以甲對乙的請求權消滅(因為
甲死亡),所以甲的遺產還是100萬,不知道這樣有沒有理解錯誤?
如果沒有錯的話,對甲的繼承人蠻不公平的,而且夫妻財產請求權也廢掉大半...
想了蠻久了,想跟大家討論看看
--
譬如甲和乙為夫妻,甲死後財產100萬,而生存的乙有300萬,依舊法的話甲對乙有
100萬的夫妻財產請求權,所以甲的財產是200萬
但在本項增訂後,夫妻財產請求權不得讓與和繼承,所以甲對乙的請求權消滅(因為
甲死亡),所以甲的遺產還是100萬,不知道這樣有沒有理解錯誤?
如果沒有錯的話,對甲的繼承人蠻不公平的,而且夫妻財產請求權也廢掉大半...
想了蠻久了,想跟大家討論看看
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Tristan Cohan
at 2013-02-06T03:24
at 2013-02-06T03:24
By Linda
at 2013-02-06T18:58
at 2013-02-06T18:58
By Hazel
at 2013-02-10T04:40
at 2013-02-10T04:40
By Zenobia
at 2013-02-13T20:52
at 2013-02-13T20:52
By Kumar
at 2013-02-16T05:53
at 2013-02-16T05:53
By Carolina Franco
at 2013-02-20T03:38
at 2013-02-20T03:38
By Irma
at 2013-02-20T22:41
at 2013-02-20T22:41
By Yedda
at 2013-02-23T23:31
at 2013-02-23T23:31
By Skylar Davis
at 2013-02-26T15:31
at 2013-02-26T15:31
Related Posts
刑法等價客體錯誤
By Kelly
at 2013-02-01T19:21
at 2013-02-01T19:21
soa 考試護照相關問題
By Daniel
at 2013-02-01T19:04
at 2013-02-01T19:04
搶時間,請益一下。
By Hedwig
at 2013-02-01T18:49
at 2013-02-01T18:49
刑法等價客體錯誤
By Joe
at 2013-02-01T18:48
at 2013-02-01T18:48
100彰化銀行會計
By Quanna
at 2013-02-01T18:44
at 2013-02-01T18:44