民法179 184 767的疑惑 - 考試
By John
at 2013-05-18T11:49
at 2013-05-18T11:49
Table of Contents
不好意思,一直以來一直搞不太懂民法179 184 767這三個法條的區別
179是不當得利
根據法條所寫"無法律上之原因而受利益,致他人受損害者,應返還其利益"
184是侵權行為
因故意或過失,不法侵害他人之權利者,負損害賠償責任
767是物上請求權
所有人對於無權占有或侵奪其所有物者,得請求返還之
對於這三個法條
767是否可用在動產上??畢竟動產一經交付,所有權及移轉
似乎不符767的規定?
179可否用在不動產上??因為一般常見得例子,好像都是某個動產or錢
因為給錯或是匯錯,好像都沒看過不動產可以用179要回來???
184是否限定要被不法侵害才能請求對方賠償?合法的就不行嗎??我想道的合法侵害
只有軍隊演習時,打中房子之類的(就所謂的行為合法,結果不法)
--
179是不當得利
根據法條所寫"無法律上之原因而受利益,致他人受損害者,應返還其利益"
184是侵權行為
因故意或過失,不法侵害他人之權利者,負損害賠償責任
767是物上請求權
所有人對於無權占有或侵奪其所有物者,得請求返還之
對於這三個法條
767是否可用在動產上??畢竟動產一經交付,所有權及移轉
似乎不符767的規定?
179可否用在不動產上??因為一般常見得例子,好像都是某個動產or錢
因為給錯或是匯錯,好像都沒看過不動產可以用179要回來???
184是否限定要被不法侵害才能請求對方賠償?合法的就不行嗎??我想道的合法侵害
只有軍隊演習時,打中房子之類的(就所謂的行為合法,結果不法)
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2013-05-20T21:19
at 2013-05-20T21:19
By Selena
at 2013-05-22T16:46
at 2013-05-22T16:46
By Rae
at 2013-05-26T15:22
at 2013-05-26T15:22
By Enid
at 2013-05-29T10:40
at 2013-05-29T10:40
By Callum
at 2013-06-02T09:15
at 2013-06-02T09:15
By Lydia
at 2013-06-05T15:12
at 2013-06-05T15:12
By Vanessa
at 2013-06-06T07:39
at 2013-06-06T07:39
By Olive
at 2013-06-08T11:17
at 2013-06-08T11:17
By Sandy
at 2013-06-10T04:20
at 2013-06-10T04:20
By Quintina
at 2013-06-14T03:41
at 2013-06-14T03:41
By Irma
at 2013-06-18T18:56
at 2013-06-18T18:56
By Tristan Cohan
at 2013-06-22T14:09
at 2013-06-22T14:09
By Olivia
at 2013-06-24T14:42
at 2013-06-24T14:42
By Mary
at 2013-06-25T08:41
at 2013-06-25T08:41
By Rosalind
at 2013-06-29T11:42
at 2013-06-29T11:42
By Dora
at 2013-07-02T02:36
at 2013-07-02T02:36
By Mary
at 2013-07-02T08:50
at 2013-07-02T08:50
By Regina
at 2013-07-07T01:57
at 2013-07-07T01:57
By Christine
at 2013-07-11T12:31
at 2013-07-11T12:31
Related Posts
企業倫理與社會責任
By Christine
at 2013-05-18T10:50
at 2013-05-18T10:50
調查局財經實務組
By Eartha
at 2013-05-18T10:33
at 2013-05-18T10:33
父親過世
By Puput
at 2013-05-18T10:15
at 2013-05-18T10:15
沈浩 生物
By Hamiltion
at 2013-05-18T10:13
at 2013-05-18T10:13
方家豪 化學
By Andrew
at 2013-05-18T10:11
at 2013-05-18T10:11