純粹經濟上損失? - 考試

By Kelly
at 2015-07-01T19:21
at 2015-07-01T19:21
Table of Contents
剛剛在看學稔債法解題書,在4-85頁看到一個問題(95台大B卷),想了很久,想請教一下
案例事實
甲為定作人,乙為承攬人,丙為材料商。承攬的房屋發生瑕疵係因丙提供有瑕疵之材料,
甲得向丙為如何之請求?
書上寫的請求權是184跟消保法第七條,我有問題的部分是書上寫的賠償範圍是所受損害
跟所失利益,也就是承攬房屋的價金跟找人拆除的費用。
可是房屋的價金不是依契約而生的損害,所以是純粹經濟上損失嗎?然後找人拆除的費用
也沒有涉及任何絕對權的侵害,為什麼可以依184請求?
--
Sent from my Android
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments

By Mia
at 2015-07-05T16:58
at 2015-07-05T16:58

By George
at 2015-07-09T07:30
at 2015-07-09T07:30

By Brianna
at 2015-07-12T22:34
at 2015-07-12T22:34

By Lucy
at 2015-07-13T06:40
at 2015-07-13T06:40

By Damian
at 2015-07-17T22:21
at 2015-07-17T22:21

By Skylar Davis
at 2015-07-20T09:06
at 2015-07-20T09:06

By Dora
at 2015-07-24T11:29
at 2015-07-24T11:29

By Dorothy
at 2015-07-25T18:58
at 2015-07-25T18:58

By Daniel
at 2015-07-26T21:10
at 2015-07-26T21:10
Related Posts
行政法問題

By Elizabeth
at 2015-07-01T19:03
at 2015-07-01T19:03
後中西上榜生心得+賣書(上)

By Gary
at 2015-07-01T18:33
at 2015-07-01T18:33
考試電扇狂吹 卻不開冷氣?

By Jessica
at 2015-07-01T17:43
at 2015-07-01T17:43
後醫書籍出清

By Irma
at 2015-07-01T17:41
at 2015-07-01T17:41
104後醫一年考取心得 + 賣書

By Brianna
at 2015-07-01T17:35
at 2015-07-01T17:35