考銓真的太扯了 - 考試
By George
at 2013-07-09T01:41
at 2013-07-09T01:41
Table of Contents
※ 引述《puff0826 (泡芙)》之銘言:
: 老實說,我考完普考就發現考銓和98年地特四等完全一樣,便心想該不會明天高考也考98
: 年地特三等題目吧!於是就把恐猜拿出來看了那四題...今天考銓一發下來整個傻眼,還真
: 的完全一樣欸!!可是我只有粗略看過沒有詳讀,真可惜:P
說實在的 就算重複又如何? 除了讓他上新聞外 能改變什麼
題目有違反考試規定嗎? 沒有
題目很偏門? 也沒有
看了題目 我甚至覺得 題目都挺基本的
基本到就算看過考古題 也不會有太多優勢
另外 考古題也是完全公開的資訊 不是很難取得的玩意
準備考試還能說因為我沒讀到 別人有讀 所以不公平的嗎?
沒這回事吧
--
: 老實說,我考完普考就發現考銓和98年地特四等完全一樣,便心想該不會明天高考也考98
: 年地特三等題目吧!於是就把恐猜拿出來看了那四題...今天考銓一發下來整個傻眼,還真
: 的完全一樣欸!!可是我只有粗略看過沒有詳讀,真可惜:P
說實在的 就算重複又如何? 除了讓他上新聞外 能改變什麼
題目有違反考試規定嗎? 沒有
題目很偏門? 也沒有
看了題目 我甚至覺得 題目都挺基本的
基本到就算看過考古題 也不會有太多優勢
另外 考古題也是完全公開的資訊 不是很難取得的玩意
準備考試還能說因為我沒讀到 別人有讀 所以不公平的嗎?
沒這回事吧
--
All Comments
By Zanna
at 2013-07-10T21:10
at 2013-07-10T21:10
By David
at 2013-07-14T17:41
at 2013-07-14T17:41
By Oliver
at 2013-07-18T20:31
at 2013-07-18T20:31
By James
at 2013-07-19T08:52
at 2013-07-19T08:52
By Barb Cronin
at 2013-07-19T11:56
at 2013-07-19T11:56
By Mary
at 2013-07-23T11:56
at 2013-07-23T11:56
By Xanthe
at 2013-07-23T15:08
at 2013-07-23T15:08
By Candice
at 2013-07-24T02:16
at 2013-07-24T02:16
By Susan
at 2013-07-24T03:53
at 2013-07-24T03:53
By Christine
at 2013-07-27T14:58
at 2013-07-27T14:58
By Irma
at 2013-07-30T14:46
at 2013-07-30T14:46
By Kama
at 2013-08-02T14:03
at 2013-08-02T14:03
By Olive
at 2013-08-04T06:13
at 2013-08-04T06:13
By Oscar
at 2013-08-05T07:37
at 2013-08-05T07:37
By Kama
at 2013-08-08T23:12
at 2013-08-08T23:12
By Victoria
at 2013-08-13T16:30
at 2013-08-13T16:30
By Wallis
at 2013-08-15T21:24
at 2013-08-15T21:24
By Kumar
at 2013-08-16T21:43
at 2013-08-16T21:43
By Brianna
at 2013-08-19T09:41
at 2013-08-19T09:41
By Gilbert
at 2013-08-24T04:31
at 2013-08-24T04:31
Related Posts
建國舊書
By Blanche
at 2013-07-09T00:43
at 2013-07-09T00:43
102身障四等~考題2題一問
By Isla
at 2013-07-09T00:31
at 2013-07-09T00:31
張文忠老師單字資料 0.8版
By Damian
at 2013-07-09T00:30
at 2013-07-09T00:30
學士後西醫高雄讀書會簡訊
By Hamiltion
at 2013-07-09T00:26
at 2013-07-09T00:26
102年港務公司-乙級船員-艙面組
By Eartha
at 2013-07-09T00:25
at 2013-07-09T00:25