刑法-相當因果關係,客觀歸責理論 - 考試
By Zanna
at 2014-02-27T12:41
at 2014-02-27T12:41
Table of Contents
各位前輩好,我是考一般行政高考
最近讀李允呈老師的刑法解題時,有個疑問:
當在討論因果關係時,通常的順序是
條件因果關係->相當因果關係->客觀歸責理論
有時候李老師會直接用客觀歸責來檢討,我知道有時候律師,司法考試的爭點多,可能就可以直接跳過一些鋪陳,
但我上函授時,是上撲馬老師的課,老師的客觀歸責是最後才提到一點(我只上刑總),所以現在遇到反常的因果歷程,也只習慣用相當因果關係的寫法去寫。因為怕對客觀歸責不熟,反而寫錯。重點是,我自己覺得兩者根本就是講一樣的東西 @.@(不知道我的理解對嗎?)
我想問的是,如果不特別提及客觀歸責理論,只用相當因果關係的寫法來檢討,會不會被閱卷老師認為不完整呢?
先謝過了!!
--
最近讀李允呈老師的刑法解題時,有個疑問:
當在討論因果關係時,通常的順序是
條件因果關係->相當因果關係->客觀歸責理論
有時候李老師會直接用客觀歸責來檢討,我知道有時候律師,司法考試的爭點多,可能就可以直接跳過一些鋪陳,
但我上函授時,是上撲馬老師的課,老師的客觀歸責是最後才提到一點(我只上刑總),所以現在遇到反常的因果歷程,也只習慣用相當因果關係的寫法去寫。因為怕對客觀歸責不熟,反而寫錯。重點是,我自己覺得兩者根本就是講一樣的東西 @.@(不知道我的理解對嗎?)
我想問的是,如果不特別提及客觀歸責理論,只用相當因果關係的寫法來檢討,會不會被閱卷老師認為不完整呢?
先謝過了!!
--
All Comments
By Thomas
at 2014-03-04T06:07
at 2014-03-04T06:07
By Valerie
at 2014-03-05T08:47
at 2014-03-05T08:47
By Gilbert
at 2014-03-06T09:55
at 2014-03-06T09:55
By Michael
at 2014-03-09T12:35
at 2014-03-09T12:35
By Anthony
at 2014-03-13T06:07
at 2014-03-13T06:07
By Anthony
at 2014-03-14T01:32
at 2014-03-14T01:32
By Kyle
at 2014-03-18T23:45
at 2014-03-18T23:45
By Olive
at 2014-03-23T02:32
at 2014-03-23T02:32
By Sarah
at 2014-03-24T15:34
at 2014-03-24T15:34
By Hardy
at 2014-03-26T13:57
at 2014-03-26T13:57
By Elizabeth
at 2014-03-29T15:41
at 2014-03-29T15:41
By Zora
at 2014-03-31T04:57
at 2014-03-31T04:57
By Carolina Franco
at 2014-04-03T00:18
at 2014-04-03T00:18
By John
at 2014-04-06T05:45
at 2014-04-06T05:45
By Genevieve
at 2014-04-07T06:40
at 2014-04-07T06:40
Related Posts
補習班函授問題
By Todd Johnson
at 2014-02-27T10:19
at 2014-02-27T10:19
請教電子科科目教材
By Emily
at 2014-02-27T09:43
at 2014-02-27T09:43
想請問台中補資處三等考那間補習班好?
By Dora
at 2014-02-27T09:24
at 2014-02-27T09:24
鏈波因素疑問
By Regina
at 2014-02-27T07:53
at 2014-02-27T07:53
行政法請求權時效問題
By Daph Bay
at 2014-02-27T01:55
at 2014-02-27T01:55