刑法227條的年紀認知錯誤問題 - 考試

By Una
at 2014-04-06T18:10
at 2014-04-06T18:10
Table of Contents
問題如下
甲以為乙女是15歲之人,與其發生性交,然事後才發現乙女為13歲,甲的刑責?
我的想法
就227條第1項而言,乙女13歲客觀構成要件該當,但主觀上甲以為乙女15歲因此無故意,不成立本罪。
就227條第3項而言,客觀上乙不該當本項年齡,甲有故意,所以成立未遂?
怎麼想都有點怪怪的,希望有版友賜教
謝謝!!!
--
Sent from my Android
--
甲以為乙女是15歲之人,與其發生性交,然事後才發現乙女為13歲,甲的刑責?
我的想法
就227條第1項而言,乙女13歲客觀構成要件該當,但主觀上甲以為乙女15歲因此無故意,不成立本罪。
就227條第3項而言,客觀上乙不該當本項年齡,甲有故意,所以成立未遂?
怎麼想都有點怪怪的,希望有版友賜教
謝謝!!!
--
Sent from my Android
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments

By Carolina Franco
at 2014-04-07T06:27
at 2014-04-07T06:27

By Mason
at 2014-04-09T06:02
at 2014-04-09T06:02

By John
at 2014-04-10T23:15
at 2014-04-10T23:15

By Hardy
at 2014-04-12T00:56
at 2014-04-12T00:56

By Donna
at 2014-04-15T11:00
at 2014-04-15T11:00

By Vanessa
at 2014-04-18T13:14
at 2014-04-18T13:14

By Ingrid
at 2014-04-23T05:33
at 2014-04-23T05:33

By Mia
at 2014-04-27T03:37
at 2014-04-27T03:37

By Quanna
at 2014-04-28T12:08
at 2014-04-28T12:08

By Valerie
at 2014-04-30T13:55
at 2014-04-30T13:55
Related Posts
台電養成班綜合行政人員

By Olive
at 2014-04-06T15:28
at 2014-04-06T15:28
民法-買賣契約

By Jake
at 2014-04-06T14:07
at 2014-04-06T14:07
請問自始主觀給付不能是民法哪一條?

By Christine
at 2014-04-06T13:49
at 2014-04-06T13:49
倒數的衝刺方式

By Aaliyah
at 2014-04-06T12:40
at 2014-04-06T12:40
民事訴訟法的問題

By Sierra Rose
at 2014-04-06T11:58
at 2014-04-06T11:58