喬律師民訴 迴避問題 - 考試
By Tristan Cohan
at 2015-08-21T17:08
at 2015-08-21T17:08
Table of Contents
淺見以為,若將79、2nd決議之下列文字「參與原確定判決之法官...
對於...發回更審再行上訴之事件,均不在上開解釋限制之列」套用在
2-35上方圖示,似無不合之處。
詳之,圖示中該案係於上級審判決確定(即上級審「左方之甲」所判決)。
該上級審確定判決經提起再審之訴,由丙等審理,准予再審並「發回」下級審
更審;嗣該下級審之更審判決經上訴由上級審「右方之甲」審理。
依決議上開文字,「右方之甲」無須迴避(不在上開解釋限制之列)。
尚祈各方先進指正~m^^m~
(好久沒唸書了,真對不起學長)
--
對於...發回更審再行上訴之事件,均不在上開解釋限制之列」套用在
2-35上方圖示,似無不合之處。
詳之,圖示中該案係於上級審判決確定(即上級審「左方之甲」所判決)。
該上級審確定判決經提起再審之訴,由丙等審理,准予再審並「發回」下級審
更審;嗣該下級審之更審判決經上訴由上級審「右方之甲」審理。
依決議上開文字,「右方之甲」無須迴避(不在上開解釋限制之列)。
尚祈各方先進指正~m^^m~
(好久沒唸書了,真對不起學長)
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Belly
at 2015-08-22T19:39
at 2015-08-22T19:39
By Joseph
at 2015-08-25T12:47
at 2015-08-25T12:47
By Poppy
at 2015-08-27T14:43
at 2015-08-27T14:43
By Lucy
at 2015-08-29T06:26
at 2015-08-29T06:26
By Damian
at 2015-08-30T16:03
at 2015-08-30T16:03
By Sarah
at 2015-09-04T03:48
at 2015-09-04T03:48
By Carolina Franco
at 2015-09-04T06:05
at 2015-09-04T06:05
By Ingrid
at 2015-09-05T19:18
at 2015-09-05T19:18
By Puput
at 2015-09-10T01:35
at 2015-09-10T01:35
By Charlotte
at 2015-09-12T14:44
at 2015-09-12T14:44
By Zenobia
at 2015-09-14T18:01
at 2015-09-14T18:01
By Kristin
at 2015-09-18T10:09
at 2015-09-18T10:09
By Charlotte
at 2015-09-19T07:06
at 2015-09-19T07:06
By Mason
at 2015-09-20T06:11
at 2015-09-20T06:11
Related Posts
考選部表示原則上如期舉行考試
By Hazel
at 2015-08-21T16:40
at 2015-08-21T16:40
本板真的有專業的搶贈書人嗎?
By Ethan
at 2015-08-21T15:51
at 2015-08-21T15:51
基本電學
By Joe
at 2015-08-21T15:44
at 2015-08-21T15:44
出售後中準備用書籍
By Frederic
at 2015-08-21T15:29
at 2015-08-21T15:29
志光出版歷屆試題
By James
at 2015-08-21T14:24
at 2015-08-21T14:24