有關民總及民訴的看書疑問! - 考試
By Quanna
at 2016-05-24T00:07
at 2016-05-24T00:07
Table of Contents
各位好:
小弟民事法部分算初學,雖然有在補習,但總感覺下課詢問時老師回答都很簡短
且有時還略有不耐煩,所以還是煩請諸位高手幫忙解惑,謝謝!
一.民總問題:(民訴暫先不放上)
就民法77條但書上規定,限制行為能力人如果是(純獲法律上利益)
或(日常生活所須表示行為)毋須代理人同意,而民總15條之2第1項
但書也同樣明示。→個人解讀:利益直接取得!
所以按上述,應該可以推出受輔助宣告人就性質上似同於限制行為能力人
但是15條之2第四項有規定,對於輔助人於受輔助宣告人純獲法律上利益而
仍不予許時,仍須向法院請求,就法院所做出表示替代該輔助人的允許,
而對於輔助人濫權不行權利,於受有輔助宣告之人受有純獲法律上利益時,
是否可類推77條但書效果而直接取得,不須還要花勞力時間費用向法院聲請????
--
小弟民事法部分算初學,雖然有在補習,但總感覺下課詢問時老師回答都很簡短
且有時還略有不耐煩,所以還是煩請諸位高手幫忙解惑,謝謝!
一.民總問題:(民訴暫先不放上)
就民法77條但書上規定,限制行為能力人如果是(純獲法律上利益)
或(日常生活所須表示行為)毋須代理人同意,而民總15條之2第1項
但書也同樣明示。→個人解讀:利益直接取得!
所以按上述,應該可以推出受輔助宣告人就性質上似同於限制行為能力人
但是15條之2第四項有規定,對於輔助人於受輔助宣告人純獲法律上利益而
仍不予許時,仍須向法院請求,就法院所做出表示替代該輔助人的允許,
而對於輔助人濫權不行權利,於受有輔助宣告之人受有純獲法律上利益時,
是否可類推77條但書效果而直接取得,不須還要花勞力時間費用向法院聲請????
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Callum
at 2016-05-26T15:53
at 2016-05-26T15:53
By Oliver
at 2016-05-31T05:53
at 2016-05-31T05:53
By Franklin
at 2016-06-03T22:30
at 2016-06-03T22:30
By Zenobia
at 2016-06-04T21:12
at 2016-06-04T21:12
By Odelette
at 2016-06-08T16:21
at 2016-06-08T16:21
By Hedy
at 2016-06-10T01:07
at 2016-06-10T01:07
By Olivia
at 2016-06-10T17:55
at 2016-06-10T17:55
By Eden
at 2016-06-15T00:01
at 2016-06-15T00:01
By Carolina Franco
at 2016-06-19T16:23
at 2016-06-19T16:23
By Lily
at 2016-06-24T06:09
at 2016-06-24T06:09
By Barb Cronin
at 2016-06-24T16:20
at 2016-06-24T16:20
By Jack
at 2016-06-25T11:33
at 2016-06-25T11:33
By Poppy
at 2016-06-25T21:03
at 2016-06-25T21:03
By Charlotte
at 2016-06-27T23:47
at 2016-06-27T23:47
By Tristan Cohan
at 2016-07-02T15:28
at 2016-07-02T15:28
By Charlotte
at 2016-07-03T03:25
at 2016-07-03T03:25
Related Posts
電子學地方四等
By Lucy
at 2016-05-23T20:04
at 2016-05-23T20:04
共有物分割訴訟之當事人
By Todd Johnson
at 2016-05-23T18:45
at 2016-05-23T18:45
政治學的系統論
By Iris
at 2016-05-23T18:38
at 2016-05-23T18:38
102政大公司法(第15條)
By Eden
at 2016-05-23T18:29
at 2016-05-23T18:29
貨幣幻覺
By Anthony
at 2016-05-23T18:19
at 2016-05-23T18:19