竊取的定義 - 考試

By Daph Bay
at 2017-02-07T20:24
at 2017-02-07T20:24
Table of Contents
看補習班書上寫
竊取為"未經他人同意而破壞他人持有並建立自己持有"
但搶奪 、強盜不也都是"未經他人同意而破壞他人持有並建立自己持有"嗎
這樣的定義精確嗎?學說有爭議嗎?
新手上路,敬請不吝賜教。
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments

By Hedy
at 2017-02-12T19:33
at 2017-02-12T19:33
台高院103上訴字379(強盜與竊盜之分)

By Hedwig
at 2017-02-16T03:40
at 2017-02-16T03:40
不備、不及抗拒而公然奪取,強盜則以強暴脅迫使人不能抗
拒

By Skylar Davis
at 2017-02-17T10:53
at 2017-02-17T10:53

By Necoo
at 2017-02-18T19:30
at 2017-02-18T19:30

By Oscar
at 2017-02-21T00:18
at 2017-02-21T00:18

By Edward Lewis
at 2017-02-23T04:53
at 2017-02-23T04:53

By Anonymous
at 2017-02-24T18:13
at 2017-02-24T18:13

By Todd Johnson
at 2017-03-01T07:00
at 2017-03-01T07:00
採哪說,建議你採學說,不然你奪取跟竊盜會有灰色地帶

By Brianna
at 2017-03-05T20:54
at 2017-03-05T20:54
抗拒就論強盜

By Joseph
at 2017-03-07T21:51
at 2017-03-07T21:51

By Michael
at 2017-03-08T05:23
at 2017-03-08T05:23
,並建立自己持有,不涉及到干預他人人身自由

By Tom
at 2017-03-09T02:03
at 2017-03-09T02:03
他人的財產造成危害

By Megan
at 2017-03-14T01:53
at 2017-03-14T01:53

By Jacky
at 2017-03-17T23:17
at 2017-03-17T23:17
持有寬鬆=竊盜、持有緊密=搶奪

By Megan
at 2017-03-20T17:38
at 2017-03-20T17:38

By Madame
at 2017-03-24T15:37
at 2017-03-24T15:37

By Belly
at 2017-03-25T05:50
at 2017-03-25T05:50
詐恐擄)與破壞所有(侵占)。其中竊搶強都是破壞持有
關係的犯罪,竊為基本型態,搶奪則因為財物與被害人具
緊密持有關係,此種型態的犯罪除破壞持有關係,搶奪過
程更可能導致被害人額外受有身體上的損害,故加重規定
為獨立一條,可以把他看做破壞持有關係的特殊型態。同
理,強盜則因行為係以致使被害人不能抗拒的意思自由絕
對強制手段為之,同時另外侵害被害人的意思自主決定權
,可責程度較高和可能導致的侵害更廣,故同樣為特殊型
態。

By Dinah
at 2017-03-26T09:30
at 2017-03-26T09:30
辦,這種狀況對我一直很困擾

By Mary
at 2017-03-30T05:29
at 2017-03-30T05:29
Related Posts
司律-申論題之跪求大大罵我

By Anthony
at 2017-02-07T17:21
at 2017-02-07T17:21
司律歷屆現在都只出十年了嗎

By Hazel
at 2017-02-07T14:45
at 2017-02-07T14:45
105司法官上榜心得

By Sierra Rose
at 2017-02-07T13:28
at 2017-02-07T13:28
政治學問題請益

By Mia
at 2017-02-07T11:19
at 2017-02-07T11:19
未來高普考變更科目

By Suhail Hany
at 2017-02-07T10:37
at 2017-02-07T10:37