純正身分犯和間接正犯 - 考試

By Edward Lewis
at 2013-04-21T20:38
at 2013-04-21T20:38
Table of Contents
周昉的課本中有一例:
公務員甲欲行收賄,於是利用知情且熱心之私人助理乙收受該筆賄賂,應如何論處?
1.實務:甲乙共同實行依31I成立共同正犯。
請問「共同實行」是指犯意聯絡、行為分擔嗎?甲乙算是有行為分擔嗎?
2.學理:甲成立間接正犯,乙只能成立幫助犯
間接正犯不是要有優越的意思支配嗎?
為什麼在乙知情的狀況下,甲能成立間接正犯呢?
假如甲乙有行為分擔,那甲不是正犯嗎?為什麼是間接正犯?
被純正身分犯搞得很混亂
不知道各位前輩有無容易理解的方法能指導一下,謝謝!orz
---
另有一題(應該是?)類似題,敘述比較詳細
甲為地方政府課長,知道公務員不能收賄,其妻乙為家庭主婦,乙的行為不會構成瀆職罪
因而與妻乙分工合作,處理案件時,甲視案件暗示對方送錢給乙。
某年市民丙提出申請案,甲、丙均知該案不符要件;
經甲暗示後,丙於某天中午到甲家送水果及信封內裝10萬台幣給乙,
離開時被埋伏之調查員捕獲,乙、丙坦承收賄行為。請問甲乙丙行為如何論處?
--
公務員甲欲行收賄,於是利用知情且熱心之私人助理乙收受該筆賄賂,應如何論處?
1.實務:甲乙共同實行依31I成立共同正犯。
請問「共同實行」是指犯意聯絡、行為分擔嗎?甲乙算是有行為分擔嗎?
2.學理:甲成立間接正犯,乙只能成立幫助犯
間接正犯不是要有優越的意思支配嗎?
為什麼在乙知情的狀況下,甲能成立間接正犯呢?
假如甲乙有行為分擔,那甲不是正犯嗎?為什麼是間接正犯?
被純正身分犯搞得很混亂
不知道各位前輩有無容易理解的方法能指導一下,謝謝!orz
---
另有一題(應該是?)類似題,敘述比較詳細
甲為地方政府課長,知道公務員不能收賄,其妻乙為家庭主婦,乙的行為不會構成瀆職罪
因而與妻乙分工合作,處理案件時,甲視案件暗示對方送錢給乙。
某年市民丙提出申請案,甲、丙均知該案不符要件;
經甲暗示後,丙於某天中午到甲家送水果及信封內裝10萬台幣給乙,
離開時被埋伏之調查員捕獲,乙、丙坦承收賄行為。請問甲乙丙行為如何論處?
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments

By Skylar Davis
at 2013-04-23T02:01
at 2013-04-23T02:01

By Rae
at 2013-04-23T21:59
at 2013-04-23T21:59

By Thomas
at 2013-04-26T13:58
at 2013-04-26T13:58

By Doris
at 2013-04-27T17:35
at 2013-04-27T17:35

By Todd Johnson
at 2013-04-28T06:29
at 2013-04-28T06:29

By Robert
at 2013-05-01T07:23
at 2013-05-01T07:23

By Damian
at 2013-05-02T17:04
at 2013-05-02T17:04

By Suhail Hany
at 2013-05-03T05:19
at 2013-05-03T05:19

By Aaliyah
at 2013-05-04T03:11
at 2013-05-04T03:11

By Elvira
at 2013-05-07T22:44
at 2013-05-07T22:44

By Elvira
at 2013-05-08T17:35
at 2013-05-08T17:35

By William
at 2013-05-10T23:42
at 2013-05-10T23:42

By Jack
at 2013-05-12T14:08
at 2013-05-12T14:08

By Sierra Rose
at 2013-05-16T03:02
at 2013-05-16T03:02

By Ingrid
at 2013-05-20T12:41
at 2013-05-20T12:41

By Enid
at 2013-05-23T18:10
at 2013-05-23T18:10

By Callum
at 2013-05-25T15:41
at 2013-05-25T15:41

By Genevieve
at 2013-05-26T07:55
at 2013-05-26T07:55

By Heather
at 2013-05-30T12:03
at 2013-05-30T12:03

By Barb Cronin
at 2013-06-02T11:28
at 2013-06-02T11:28

By Ida
at 2013-06-05T04:13
at 2013-06-05T04:13

By Joseph
at 2013-06-09T09:45
at 2013-06-09T09:45

By Donna
at 2013-06-10T18:27
at 2013-06-10T18:27

By Donna
at 2013-06-11T19:36
at 2013-06-11T19:36

By Xanthe
at 2013-06-12T07:10
at 2013-06-12T07:10

By Freda
at 2013-06-16T05:21
at 2013-06-16T05:21

By Noah
at 2013-06-20T09:05
at 2013-06-20T09:05

By Quanna
at 2013-06-25T05:11
at 2013-06-25T05:11

By Charlie
at 2013-06-30T00:58
at 2013-06-30T00:58

By Hedy
at 2013-07-01T19:31
at 2013-07-01T19:31

By Ivy
at 2013-07-06T13:10
at 2013-07-06T13:10

By Rachel
at 2013-07-08T20:00
at 2013-07-08T20:00

By Suhail Hany
at 2013-07-12T12:05
at 2013-07-12T12:05

By Xanthe
at 2013-07-14T06:53
at 2013-07-14T06:53

By Jake
at 2013-07-14T23:55
at 2013-07-14T23:55

By William
at 2013-07-15T16:45
at 2013-07-15T16:45

By Barb Cronin
at 2013-07-20T00:56
at 2013-07-20T00:56

By Hamiltion
at 2013-07-22T19:24
at 2013-07-22T19:24

By Jake
at 2013-07-23T01:46
at 2013-07-23T01:46

By Odelette
at 2013-07-24T11:44
at 2013-07-24T11:44

By Olive
at 2013-07-25T11:33
at 2013-07-25T11:33

By Hazel
at 2013-07-26T06:48
at 2013-07-26T06:48

By Sandy
at 2013-07-30T08:19
at 2013-07-30T08:19

By Enid
at 2013-08-03T09:48
at 2013-08-03T09:48

By Carolina Franco
at 2013-08-06T06:12
at 2013-08-06T06:12
Related Posts
運輸學 有關航權

By Eartha
at 2013-04-21T19:20
at 2013-04-21T19:20
行政學丹哈特典範疑問

By Mason
at 2013-04-21T18:40
at 2013-04-21T18:40
行政法師資請教

By Brianna
at 2013-04-21T17:29
at 2013-04-21T17:29
刑法原因自由行為→客體錯誤

By Isabella
at 2013-04-21T17:05
at 2013-04-21T17:05
邱律師的證交法與公司法?

By Anonymous
at 2013-04-21T16:35
at 2013-04-21T16:35