義務衝突疑問 - 考試
By Jack
at 2014-04-19T11:40
at 2014-04-19T11:40
Table of Contents
經典案例就是
甲帶兩個甲之小孩同時到河邊戲水,而兩個小孩同時溺水,甲僅救一個,依照複數作為義務衝突,甲有超法規阻卻違法事由的適用,所以不作為不具違法性
但我有在課本看到,因生命法益具有絕對保護性及不可比較性,所以甲還是具有違法性,這種說法是少數見解嗎
--
Sent from my Android
--
甲帶兩個甲之小孩同時到河邊戲水,而兩個小孩同時溺水,甲僅救一個,依照複數作為義務衝突,甲有超法規阻卻違法事由的適用,所以不作為不具違法性
但我有在課本看到,因生命法益具有絕對保護性及不可比較性,所以甲還是具有違法性,這種說法是少數見解嗎
--
Sent from my Android
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Kelly
at 2014-04-24T03:56
at 2014-04-24T03:56
By Edith
at 2014-04-24T17:34
at 2014-04-24T17:34
By Elma
at 2014-04-26T19:03
at 2014-04-26T19:03
By Elvira
at 2014-05-01T01:16
at 2014-05-01T01:16
By Rae
at 2014-05-03T11:41
at 2014-05-03T11:41
By Valerie
at 2014-05-08T07:32
at 2014-05-08T07:32
Related Posts
刑總的共謀共同正犯
By David
at 2014-04-19T09:23
at 2014-04-19T09:23
以戶政五等為目標 有推薦的補習班嗎?
By Victoria
at 2014-04-19T00:18
at 2014-04-19T00:18
地政求解~關於繁榮街道路線價區段公保地
By Quintina
at 2014-04-18T23:01
at 2014-04-18T23:01
請問一題100年桃捷捷運概述題目
By John
at 2014-04-18T22:57
at 2014-04-18T22:57
大家都會用複數計算機 fx-127
By Susan
at 2014-04-18T22:06
at 2014-04-18T22:06