鑑定人書面報告和鑑定人詰問? - 考試
By Noah
at 2014-03-20T14:29
at 2014-03-20T14:29
Table of Contents
請問鑑定人206的書面報告是傳聞例外
但是J582 又說傳聞例外不等於詰問例外
我有點不太懂,既然鑑定報告都可以例外具有證據能力可以不需要直接審理
那為何還會需要詰問鑑定人呢?
還是說雖然書面報告可以有證據能力,但是如果被告要求詰問鑑定人
鑑定人還是要到場受詰問
如果鑑定人陳述與報告有矛盾,最後還是要採鑑定人陳述(因為有直接審理)?
那此時鑑定報告還會有證據能力嗎?還是說只是證明力降低?
實在不太懂~
想請教各位~
--
Tags:
考試
All Comments
By Tom
at 2014-03-23T06:38
at 2014-03-23T06:38
By Victoria
at 2014-03-25T06:59
at 2014-03-25T06:59
By Oliver
at 2014-03-27T13:43
at 2014-03-27T13:43
By Puput
at 2014-03-30T10:11
at 2014-03-30T10:11
By Oliver
at 2014-03-30T12:11
at 2014-03-30T12:11
Related Posts
法律名詞問題
By Valerie
at 2014-03-20T14:28
at 2014-03-20T14:28
會計權益法算投資金額題型相同解法卻不同
By Dinah
at 2014-03-20T14:25
at 2014-03-20T14:25
有女朋友還能考上嗎
By Hedwig
at 2014-03-20T13:20
at 2014-03-20T13:20
請問服貿協議的法律定位
By Faithe
at 2014-03-20T12:53
at 2014-03-20T12:53
請問勞動部改制後,屬何性質機關
By Jacob
at 2014-03-20T12:01
at 2014-03-20T12:01